Why might our estimates of epidemiological delays be biased?
We are trying to estimate an incubation period. For person A we know exposure happened on day 1 and symptom onset on day 3.
We are trying to estimate an incubation period. For person A we know exposure happened on day 1 and symptom onset on day 3.
We are trying to estimate an incubation period. For person A we know exposure happened on day 1 and symptom onset on day 3.
We are trying to estimate an incubation period. For person A we know exposure happened on day 1 and symptom onset on day 3.
The true incubation period of A could be anywhere between 1 and 3 days (but not all equally likely).
We are trying to estimate an incubation period. Each arrow represents one person with an associated pair of events (infection and symptom onset).
We are trying to estimate an incubation period. Each arrow represents one person with an associated pair of events (infection and symptom onset).
We are trying to estimate an incubation period. Each arrow represents one person with an associated pair of events (infection and symptom onset).
We are trying to estimate an incubation period. Each arrow represents one person with an associated pair of events (infection and symptom onset)
On the day of analysis we have not observed some delays yet, and these tended to be longer. This is made worse during periods of exponential growth.
Introduction to biases in epidemiological delays