Figure credit (Shandross et al. 2026)
Average of multiple predictions is often (not always) more performant than any individual model
Strong evidence in weather & economic forecasting
Recent evidence in infectious disease forecasting
Figure credit: Shandross et al. (2026)
Let \(F_m(x)\) be a cumulative density function (CDF) given by forecast model \(m\).
\[F_{LOP}(x) = \sum_{m=1}^M w_m F_m(x) \]
Figure credit: Shandross et al. (2026)
Let \(F_m^{-1}(\theta)\) be the inverse CDF, or the quantile function, for quantile level \(\theta\).
\[F_Q^{-1}(\theta) = \sum_{m=1}^M w_m F_m^{-1}(\theta) \]
Figure credit: (Shandross et al. 2026)
\[F_{LOP}(x) = \sum_{m=1}^M w_m F_m(x) \]
With a handful of models you have fit yourself, you can build an ensemble with a few lines of code.
What gets hard is the logistics at scale: collecting many forecasts in a shared format, validating them, and synthesizing them.
Collaborative “hubs” exist to handle that logistics problem. They are not a prerequisite for ensembling – they just make it a whole lot easier once a few models or teams are involved.
Projects run by research groups, public health agencies
Participation generally open
Standard format enables
Reich et al. (2022)
Multi-model ensembles